@GreenFire @PaulNickson They know they can make money from snuff movies, but what's new is that they've worked out how they can get away with broadcasting the first one. Subsequent ones will be easier once the principle has been established.

Donald Trump wandered aimlessly around the stage as the attack happened and cracked a joke. https://trib.al/MHLkQLf

Given the public confirmation that Russia interfered in the UK’s Brexit vote, and Trump’s deal to help fund Russia’s war attacking Ukraine, today’s a good day to revisit the fact that Russia paid Trump supporting propagandists in Canada to attack Canada, Canadians, our elections, and Canada’s national security.

From two years ago. Don’t for a moment believe that this stopped then. See also the Americans sowing division in Alberta and across media.

“Meet the right-wing Canadian “influencers” accused of collaborating with an alleged Russian propaganda scheme | CBC News”

cbc.ca/news/investigates/russi

#Canada #Russian #USA #Trump #Traitors #Terrorists

Yet another #Epstein whistleblower has "committed suicide."

Despite the tremendous psychological toll of fighting power as Simon Andriesz so bravely did, I think we can all agree this stinks to high heaven.

forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/

“We're run by a sex predator, lunatic, a felon, a bankrupter, a fraud…”

“Every freaking thing out of the guy is a fraud and a lie.”

And Ben isn't letting corporate media off the hook either.

x.com/MeidasTouch/...

MeidasTouch (@MeidasTouch) on ...

Our new “Ambassador to Greece”, Kimberly Guilfoyle is a grifting, criming asshole.

Who could have ever guessed? 😂

x.com/JoJoFromJerz...

x.com/JoJoFromJerz/s...

RT: @newscord_org Published, then erased, with no explanation.

The Daily Mail, followed by The Telegraph, reported that a named individual, connected to a House of Lords member, had been charged with a serious criminal offence. Both articles have since vanished.

There has been no correction, no clarification and no statement.

That silence is the failure. If the story was wrong, the Editors' Code requires a prompt, prominent correction. A quiet deletion leaves the claim circulating in screenshots, with nothing on the record to rebut it.

If it was pulled for legal reasons, readers deserve to be told that much.

We are calling on both papers to explain what happened. A newspaper that withdraws a story this grave owes an account to the public and to the person it named.

Show older
TalkedAbout Social

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!