@HeavenlyPossum

The thing that's always frustrated me about anarchists (from what you've written, I'm assuming that's you) is that you imagine groups of people will just *do* things, collectively, for the betterment of all. And that will work. Humans have way too much of the "what's in it for me?" gene for that to work on any kind of scale. I mean, hell, sit through any HOA meeting ever held...

@ScottSoCal @HeavenlyPossum@kolektiva.social Stories about a breakdown and anarchy are always about struggle that is because people are involved. If you look at North America prior to the arrival of Europeans, there could be peace or war between tribes. There was no state, but there still was authority and structure on a smaller scale. I think the anarchist point is this is better, than the large State,. But the issue today with billions of people on the planet, it would be the bloody transition as I imagine.

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
TalkedAbout Social

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!