Show newer
Huntn00 boosted

@TucsonSentinel In contentious times this is more needed than ever, the thing is the major parties will fight it tooth and nail. I heard it called Instant Runoff voting, but this label is more descriptive.

Huntn00 boosted

As ranked choice voting gains momentum, parties in power push back tucsonsentinel.com/nationworld
Ranked choice voting has become increasingly popular over the past decade, with 13 million American voters in 51 jurisdictions now using the system in which voters rank candidates based on preference - but the challenge to the status quo has led to opposition from people in power.
#Tucson #Arizona

@i_dabble@strangeobject.space @HeavenlyPossum@kolektiva.social @mloxton @RD4Anarchy@kolektiva.social @foolishowl The problem with exporting manufacturing is that Corpos don’t care about unemployed, but while they care about markets, they have not put 2 and2 together to figure out the practise undermines the markets they want to sell to. A govt that really cares is vital, an entity we vote in. But we have a lot of sheep listening to BS fairy tales from conmen. 🤔

@HeavenlyPossum@kolektiva.social @foolishowl @i_dabble@strangeobject.space @mloxton @RD4Anarchy@kolektiva.social I agree with what you are saying , but we don’t live in a anarchist world either. The debate is whom do you want to blame? An easy question is why don’t the masses overthrow Capitalism? Not defending Capitalism. However, revolutions are tough requiring masses with nothing left to lose to get them going. Give automation and AI a chance, who knows? 🤔

@DoomsdaysCW@kolektiva.social Typical Right Wing response: It’s happened before, not my worry. 🔥😬🔥

Huntn00 boosted

Just pulled my second skin bandage off and OOOOOOOOOOOUCH :blobfoxnotlikethis: #tattoo

Huntn00 boosted

@jabsonik Happy BDay! When the time comes, just don’t reciprocate. I no longer celebrate that reminder. 🙃

Huntn00 boosted

My 54th birthday celebrations have included:
– A long breakfast
– A nap after that
– Hearing some marvellous, atmospheric #funk / #jazz drifting into my sleep from the playlist I left running on shuffle… and not finding the song afterwards from the list. So was it an invention of my dream or a mutation of some tune on the playlist?

Annyhoo, I guess that was my birthday gift. Thank you, brain. Kinda defines a lot of stuff in my life.

Huntn00 boosted

An Iowa poll has Trump at 40% among Rs, 20% ahead of R competition. Reasons for TLove, my take:
*They’re picking on him.
*Weaponized Justice Dept.
*He did nothing wrong.
*I’ll vote for Beelzebub before any Democrat.
*I’ve broken bad.
*Fascism, it’s not that bad.
*I‘ve always preferred liars to give me the advantage.
*He can use me any way he wants too. ❤️‍🔥
*He’s my favorite Golden Calf!
* White Make Right!
*The Constitution is not a good deal for me.

Huntn00 boosted
Huntn00 boosted
Huntn00 boosted

In a historic and wonderful decision, the people of Ecuador chose by referendum to stop the extraction of oil from their Amazonian region, one of the most biodiverse in the world.

Yay!
✊❤️‍🔥🎉

infotel.ca/newsitem/lt-ecuador

Huntn00 boosted
Huntn00 boosted

@breadandcircuses You know, we can’t afford this fix, better to burn up than lose my pile of gold. 🤔

Huntn00 boosted

In the piece below, the author asks, "Why is the government putting big money behind dubious carbon capture projects that specifically benefit Big Oil and help delay climate action?"

Spoiler: It's capitalism.

You probably already knew that, but the article does a great job of explaining exactly why subsidizing carbon capture is such a disastrous policy choice, and why the Biden administration nevertheless is pouring billions of dollars into it...
__________________________

Record heat waves. Widespread fires. Devastating storms. The tragic toll of climate change is becoming more evident every day.

To avoid even more severe impacts in the future, we must quickly and dramatically cut greenhouse gas emissions — largely caused by fossil fuels. Fortunately, the tools we need to cut emissions through energy efficiency, renewable energy, and beyond are growing quickly, becoming better and more affordable over time.

We will also need some “carbon removal” in the future — where we use nature (with trees or soils) or industrial processes to take carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, sequester it, and keep it from adding to our climate woes.

In the last few years, more attention has focused on industrial methods, because they can bury carbon in permanent, geologic reservoirs, unlike trees and soils that can burn down or be plowed up. In principle, this makes sense. But in practice, industrial carbon removal is wildly expensive, far too energy and resource intensive, and only removes pathetically small amounts of carbon. It’s nowhere near being a viable solution to climate change.

For the foreseeable future, cutting emissions is the most feasible means of addressing climate change. And whatever carbon removal we might eventually develop should only be used to address the final, hard-to-abate emissions left after fossil fuels are phased out. Most of all, carbon removal should *never* be used as a substitute for cutting emissions, or to help delay phasing out fossil fuels.

So why is the federal government doing exactly the opposite — putting big money behind dubious carbon capture projects, in ways that specifically benefit Big Oil and help delay climate action?
__________________________

FULL ARTICLE -- globalecoguy.org/stop-giving-b

#Environment #Climate #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis #ClimateEmergency #CO2 #Emissions #Capitalism #BusinessAsUsual

Show older
TalkedAbout Social

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!