@lednaBM I do not believe in all the *other* “gods” that you reject, plus one more.
@yoused
2/3
Not knowing something simply implies you don't understand "how" something works. Humans who have difficulty comprehending the natural world always look to the "why" something works. That's an exercise in entertainment and disavows what we do know. And I'm sorry, but the evidence says god(s) were invented for religions to manipulate people incorrectly and immorally. Furthermore, as they evolved culturally, they had to make it so god(s) could not be proven. Otherwise it wasn't useful.
@yoused
3/3
So, they basically formulated a single god(s) from a basic understanding of math. You can't square a circle or circle a square. You can't prove there's a square circle. That's square 😉 in the supernatural. It can't be proven. But that the apologists trying to get others to be manipulated by it can demand it proves all day it does not exist because we don't know. We do know. Lastly, an unprovable god(s) can try to exist forever in the area of doubt. All of it clever, till it's not..
@yoused
1/3
The problem is that if you want to infer something natural, then it must be subject to Nature and the natural laws revealed through science. If you imbue something(s) with powers beyond the natural knowledge we've accumulated, it's understandable, but then it is not evidence of the monotheistic god(s). It's simply an advanced alien lifeform. The supernatural is and has always been a substitute for not knowing with bullshit explanations, but demanding fealty to those explanations...