There is zero chance that a justice appointed by a Democratic President would not have resigned weeks ago under remotely similar circumstances. Zero.

What is it about Republican appointees that has them thinking this is all perfectly fine and dandy rather than evidence of gross corruption of the Supreme Court?

Clarence Thomas had a child in private school. Harlan Crow paid the tuition
dailykos.com/stories/2023/5/4/

Follow

@joeinwynnewood the D agenda is largely SQ and widely supported while the R agenda ("Reactionary", 'we want the '50s back, don't ask which century') is not popular so it must be more important. Ends > means. Corruption is ok in support of *OUR* cause.

Now, it is true that "the majority" are usually wrong, in general, but that does not per se confer correct upon your random minority. If they are insane sociopaths (Rs), they can just FO.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
TalkedAbout Social

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!